Customer Logins
Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.
Customer Logins
INFOGRAPHIC
Sep 06, 2019
From hope to frustration
A sense of hope emerged for many Mexicans when Andrés Manuel
López Obrador (AMLO) won the presidential election in July 2018.
However, on 29 October 2018, reality set in for investors. Only a
month prior to taking office, AMLO announced the cancellation of a
new US$13 billion airport for Mexico City, which was under
construction, sending warning signals throughout the international
business community that investments were at risk. Since then, AMLO
cancelled all future upstream oil industry farmouts, falling back
to an era in which international investment is limited to service
contracts, allowing the government to have more control.
Additionally, AMLO's actions have redirected Pemex toward its
nationalistic tendencies by forcing increased refinery runs using
locally produced crude instead of importing products from the
United States. As a result, Mexico has not been able to take full
advantage of a tight market for heavy, sour crude oil caused in
part by the halt of Venezuelan supply to the US Gulf Coast (USGC).
This outcome has meant sacrificing economic gains in favor of
political ideology. Mexican crude oil production has continued to
decline from 1.73 MMb/d in December 2018, when AMLO took office, to
1.70 MMb/d in July 2019. This decline was largely caused by the
decrease in production from the Ku-Maloob-Zaap (KMZ) complex,
Mexico's most productive asset since 2009, which declined 16,400
b/d in the same period. Because of the decline in production of
lighter crude grades Isthmus and Olmeca, a hard stop on light crude
exports occurred in the first half of 2018. Furthermore, Mexico's
refining sector is mostly configured to run light crudes. With the
decrease in light crude and severe maintenance issues, Mexico's
refinery runs teetered around a utilization rate of just 40%
utilization in July.
Maya heavy crude production declined from 1.07 MMb/d in 2018 to
1.06 MMb/d in 2019 year to date. Comparing the first half of 2018
to the first half of 2019, it is evident that the trend in exports
has shifted from the United States to Asia, with an 7% decrease and
a 35% increase, respectively. The Maya Louisiana Light Sweet-(LLS)
spread narrowed to a $0.08/bbl discount in November 2018 as
Canadian bottlenecks increased Maya attractiveness, but the price
has since stabilized ahead of International Maritime Organization
(IMO) 2020. In an attempt to showcase a positive outlook for
Pemex's production and finances, on 16 July 2019, the state-owned
company released its business plan for 2019-23, which highlights a
reduction in the profit sharing tax from 65% to 54% in 2021. While
the tax reduction will allow the national oil company (NOC) to
invest more into upstream production, the decision cannot be
decided by Pemex, but rather by the Ministry of Finance and Public
Credit. The plan also estimates that production will reach 2.7
MMb/d by 2024 by focusing investments in onshore and shallow-water
fields. There are no signposts about the possibility of additional
farm-outs, which are viewed as necessary to reversing production
declines.
You may also be interested in some of our additional Latin America focused research and analysis:
- Brazil spotlight - Underdog to Chapion: Unlock the Presalt Potential
- Venezuela spotlight - Venezuelan darkness plagues production
- IHS Markit Latin America Energy Coverage
This article was published by S&P Global Commodity Insights and not by S&P Global Ratings, which is a separately managed division of S&P Global.
{"items" : [
{"name":"share","enabled":true,"desc":"<strong>Share</strong>","mobdesc":"Share","options":[ {"name":"facebook","url":"https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3a%2f%2fprod.azure.ihsmarkit.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2ffrom-hope-to-frustration.html","enabled":true},{"name":"twitter","url":"https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fprod.azure.ihsmarkit.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2ffrom-hope-to-frustration.html&text=From+hope+to+frustration+%7c+S%26P+Global+","enabled":true},{"name":"linkedin","url":"https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=http%3a%2f%2fprod.azure.ihsmarkit.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2ffrom-hope-to-frustration.html","enabled":true},{"name":"email","url":"?subject=From hope to frustration | S&P Global &body=http%3a%2f%2fprod.azure.ihsmarkit.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2ffrom-hope-to-frustration.html","enabled":true},{"name":"whatsapp","url":"https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=From+hope+to+frustration+%7c+S%26P+Global+ http%3a%2f%2fprod.azure.ihsmarkit.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2ffrom-hope-to-frustration.html","enabled":true}]}, {"name":"rtt","enabled":true,"mobdesc":"Top"}
]}